Available from Solano Press The most comprehensive treatment of local government finance in any state that I have ever seen. This guide will prove useful to elected and appointed local government officials, business leaders, reporters, students, faculty, and
others who are struggling to understand the highly complex world of local government finance in California.
~ Chris McKenzie,
Exec.Dir. League of Calif Cities 1999-2016
Available from The League of California CitiesThe California Municipal Revenue Sources Handbook, NEW! Sixth Edition by Michael Coleman. The definitive resource on municipal funding for city and county managers, finance officers, academics and other professionals
engaged in the complex world of municipal finance in California.
Financing California Cities - Overviews and Primers
You Pay Taxes - Where Does it Go? A presentation from the
California taxpayers' perspective showing common taxes,
emphasizing how much cities receive. Oct'16 (PDF)
Brief Glossary of Financial Management Terms; This glossary, available in English and
Spanish, is designed to help non-finance experts understand some of the terminology used in public agency financial management. Institute for Local
Government.
Proposition 13: Some Unintended Consequences . Jeffrey I.
Chapman, Public Policy Institute of California 1998. Proposition 13
had three unanticipated consequences: 1) the fiscalization of land
use, 2) the growth of arcane finance techniques, and 3) the increase
of state control over local government finance. (PDF)
Patterns in
California Government Revenues Since Proposition 13. Michael A.
Shires, Public Policy Institute of California 1999. This report
examines the changes that have occurred in state and local public
finance between the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 and 1995,
addressing three questions: 1) How has the share of locally
controlled revenues changed? 2) How has the spending flexibility of
state and local revenues changed? 3) How has the composition of
state and local revenues changed?
Has
Proposition 13 Delivered? The Changing Tax Burden in California . Michael A. Shires, John Ellwood, and Mary Sprague, Public Policy
Institute of California 1998. One question that has arisen in the
debate over public finances is whether Proposition 13 has succeeded
in reducing the tax burden of Californians. This report shows that
it has.
Proposition 13: A Look Back. KPBS San Diego's Feb 2010 well
done review of Proposition 13 and its legacy. [Video]
No-Property-Tax Cities After Propositon 13. Bob Leland, Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and Julie Nauman,
Assembly Local Government Committee, Sacramento, November 1980.
Proposition 26 and 218 Implementation Guide A thorough guide to California Constitution Articles XIIIC
and XIIID by the League of California Cities Legal
Issues Committee. August 2021.
Proposition 1A Protection of Local Government Revenues
In November 2004, the voters of California approved Proposition 1A,
an amendment to the California state constitution intended to
restore predictability and stability to local government budgets.
Note: Proposition 1A does not contain the provisions of the
"VLF-for-Property-Tax-Swap of 2004" nor the ERAF III local
government contributions. These were part of the State Budget
Act of 2004.
California Local Government Governance and Reorganization
City Incorporations and the New Public
Finance. An outline of how changes to the VLF and property
tax in lieu of VLF effect the finances of future city
incorporations. By staff to the California State Senate Local
Government Committee (PDF)
City Annexations and the New Public Finance. An outline of how changes to the VLF and property tax in lieu of VLF
effect the finances of future annexations. By staff to the
California State Senate Local Government Committee (PDF)
The California Municipal Financial Health Diagnostic
Get the Diagnostic for cities here: Excel versionPDF version
January 2016 revision. The January 2016 version adds a new indicator: "#3 Capital Asset Condition," makes various minor edits and improvements, and adds a checklist for important financial
management policies.
...or for Counties ... the California County Municipal Financial Health Diagnostic. August 2016 revision. Excel version
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF): Property Tax Shifts
In 1992, facing a serious deficit position, the State of California
began shifting local property tax revenues from cities, counties and
some special districts into these funds to reduce the cost of education
to the state general fund.
ERAF facts. A concise explanation of ERAF with tables and
charts showing historic and projected ERAF losses and mitigations
for cities, counties and special districts. Aug'12 (PDF)
ERAF loss by city, county and special district.
For each city and county and for special districts grouped by
county: estimated ERAF loss, estimated ERAF loss net of mitigations
(including Proposition 172 and COPs), estimated cumulative historic
ERAF loss. PDF files:
Proposition 172 Facts. A concise
explanation of Proposition 172, the half-cent sales tax for Public
Safety adopted by voters as a partial mitigation for ERAF.
(PDF)
Frozen property tax allocations may not be the most efficient or preferred allocation now. Inefficiencies persist due to the fragmentation of policy and finance among too many local authorities and the decline of general purpose
government policy making authority.
SSTP California Board
of Governance representing California on the Streamlined Sales
Tax Project pursuant to SB157 (Chapter 702, 2003) including meeting
agendas and reports.
There have been more than a dozen
task forces, commissions, studies and proposals on local government
finance reform over the last decade alone. Here are some articles on the
problem, ideas, and analyses of recent proposals. It is important to note that, in 2004,
two important changes occurred in the state-local fiscal relationship:
the passage of Proposition 1A of 2004, and the swap of $4 billion of
state Vehicle License Fee backfill payments to cities and counties for
greater shares of local property tax revenues. These major changes
make obsolete some of the recommendations in pre-2004 reports.
"Reforming Property Tax Allocation and Authority." Remarks by Michael Coleman before the Little Hoover Commission hearing "Special Districts: Relics of the Past or
Resources for the Future?" August 2016
California Commission on Tax
Policy in the New Economy. Final Report 2003. Established by SB
1933 (Vasconcellos, 2000), to review the state's revenue programs in
light of the "new economy" and to propose structural reforms.
(PDF)
AB1221 (Steinberg/Campbell)
(2003-04) "The most significant legislative proposal affecting
California city finance since the turn of the century," (- League of
California Cities) AB1221 was intended by its authors to encourage
cities and counties to "make land use decisions based on the best
interests of their communities and not simply based on what
generates the most sales tax." Bill text and legislative committee
analyses.
Funding the Golden Years in the
Golden State: An Overview of Public Employee Post-Employment
Benefits and Recent Concerns About How to Provide and Pay for Them.
Grant Boyken. California Research Bureau. April 2007
Property Tax
The largest source of revenue for city
and county government, the complex machinations of California property
tax assessment, collection and allocation are understood by few.
California Property Tax: An Overview. A comprehensive guide
to the mechanics of California's Property Tax. California State
Board of Equalization. 2012
Chapter 4: Local Property Tax from the Revenue and Taxation
Reference Book 2003. Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation.
Thorough review of the history, rules, administration, collection
and allocation of California's property tax.
Property Tax by city .
Historic revenues from the local property tax, revenues per
capita, summary statistics. Through FY2018-19. Sept'22 (Excel)
Assessed Valuation of Property by
city . Historic Assessed Valuation, land, improvements, personal property, HOPTR, exemptions, state assessed, total net AV per capita,
summary statistics. Through FY2018-19.
July'22 (Excel)
Significant Features of the Property Tax. An
online database of property tax information for all 50 states
prepared by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and the George
Washington Institute of Public Policy.
Tax Expenditure Reports. California Department of
Finance. Includes description and value of property tax exemptions.
Reforming Property Tax Allocation and Authority Remarks by Michael Coleman before the Little Hoover Commission hearing, "Special Districts: Relics of the Past or Resources for the Future" August 2016
No-Property-Tax Cities After Propositon 13. Bob Leland, Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and Julie Nauman,
Assembly Local Government Committee, Sacramento, November 1980.
Measuring Shares
Statewide Property Tax Shares: Cities, Counties, et al . A
discussion by Michael Coleman of how (and how not) to
calculate the relative typical and statewide shares of property tax
revenues among cities, counties and other local governments.
VLF Adjustment Amounts:
FY04-05 True-Up and FY05-06 Calculations. State Controller's
Office calculations of true-up of city and county FY04-05 Property
Tax in Lieu of VLF amounts (column F) and FY05-06 Property Tax in
Lieu of VLF amounts (column K). These are the amounts that
county auditors will transfer in FY05-06. State Controller's Office.
Oct14,'05 (PDF).
NOTE: Property Tax in Lieu of VLF, also called Vehicle License Fee Adjustment Amount (VLFAA) is Property Tax, not VLF. It should be budgeted, accounted for, and reported as property tax, not VLF
and not intergovernmental. To avoid confusion, it should be called "Property Tax in Lieu of VLF" and not "VLF."
The second largest source of
general purpose revenue for cities statewide and the largest for some
California cities, the sales and use tax faces a tenuous future.
The local component of the sales and use tax is distributed to cities
and counties primarily on point-of-sale.
Overviews and Explanations
Local and District Taxes. Information for jurisdictions, sellers and purchasers from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA).
Detailed Description of the Sales & Use Tax Rate. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Breakdown of the allocation of the basic 7.5% sales and use tax rate (includes 0.25% additional voter approved rate
effective 1/1/2013 ending 12/31/16. Does not include local district transactions and use taxes.
California City
and County Sales & Use Tax Rates. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Schedules and tables including composite rates
by locality and a list of those jurisdictions with district tax
rates (add-on transactions and use taxes).
Proposition 172 Facts . A concise
explanation of Proposition 172, the half-cent sales tax for Public
Safety adopted by voters as a partial mitigation for ERAF. (PDF)
Tax Expenditure Reports. California Department of
Finance. Annual reports detailed stipulated tax exemptions with costs (expenditures) and history of relevant legislative actions.
Local Sales & Use Tax Revenues (CDTFA & BOE).
Historic annual revenue distributions (1998-99 through FY2018-19) to cities
and counties from the 1% Local Bradley Burns rate, revenues per
capita, revenues as a percentage of general revenues. Compiled from
California BOE and CDTFA reports. Includes RDA allocations. Per capita and per general revenue ratios. (Excel)
Local Sales & Use Tax Revenues (SCO).
Historic revenues by city from the 1% Local Bradley Burns rate, revenues per
capita, summary statistics as reported by local agencies to the
State Controller. Through FY11-12. August'14 (Excel) Caution: may or may not include add-on rates, triple flip reimbursements. BOE statistics (above) are more reliable.
District Taxes (Sales and Use Taxes).
Important implentation on Transactions and Use Taxes (referred to as "District Taxes" by the CDTFA and BOE) California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. April 2018
California City
and County Sales & Use Tax Rates. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Schedules and tables including composite rates
by locality and a list of those jurisdictions with district tax
rates (add-on transactions and use taxes).
Estimated Sales and Use Tax Compensation Fund Allocations. State
Department of Finance estimated sales and use tax compensation fund amounts (triple flip compensation) for cities
and counties including prior year settle-up amounts.
Via HdL Companies.
Flips, Swaps & Settle-Ups: The New In-Lieu Property Taxes. Presentation by Michael Coleman and Vallejo Asst Finance Director Susan Mayer from the Dec 2, 2005 League of California Cities
Financial Management Seminar in Monterey, CA (PDF)
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Rule on Use of Revenues
SSTP California Board
of Governance representing California on the Streamlined Sales
Tax Project pursuant to SB157 (Chapter 702, 2003) including meeting
agendas and reports.